1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2900 mm |
