1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL (661 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 513 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | SL |
Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 661 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2570 mm |