1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | 62 | Outback |
Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1750 mm |