1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
