1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 72 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 369 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2159 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2790 mm |
