1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. (141 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Thunderbolt | Mustang |
Year Released | 1941 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |