1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. (141 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt has manual transmission. 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Thunderbolt | Mustang |
Year Released | 1941 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |