1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. (141 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt.
Because 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbolt | C30 |
Year Released | 1941 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |