1941 Citroen 11 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1941 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1941 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Citroen 11 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1941 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Citroen 11 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 11 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2210 mm |
