1941 Citroen 7A vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1941 Citroen 7A. (33 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1941 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 204 kg more than 1941 Citroen 7A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1941 Citroen 7A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Citroen 7A | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | 7A | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1303 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2490 mm |
