1941 Ford Taunus vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1941 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1941 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 378 kg more than 1941 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Ford Taunus | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Taunus | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 91 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2630 mm |
