1941 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1941 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1941 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 221 kg more than 1941 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Ford Taunus | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taunus | Clio |
Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2480 mm |