1941 GAZ M1 vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 GAZ M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 GAZ M1 would be higher. At 3,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1941 GAZ M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Seat Exeo (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1941 GAZ M1. (49 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1941 GAZ M1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Seat Exeo weights approximately 30 kg more than 1941 GAZ M1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 GAZ M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 GAZ M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 GAZ M1 | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
Make | GAZ | Seat |
Model | M1 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1941 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 3285 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2642 mm |