1941 Peugeot Type 202 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Peugeot Type 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Peugeot Type 202 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1941 Peugeot Type 202. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1941 Peugeot Type 202.
Because 1941 Peugeot Type 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Peugeot Type 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Peugeot Type 202 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Peugeot | Holden |
Model | Type 202 | Epica |
Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |