1941 Peugeot Type 202 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Peugeot Type 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Peugeot Type 202 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1941 Peugeot Type 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1941 Peugeot Type 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 879 kg more than 1941 Peugeot Type 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Peugeot Type 202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Peugeot Type 202 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Peugeot | Ford |
| Model | Type 202 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1133 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3198 mm |
