1942 Aston Martin 15 vs. 1996 Renault Safrane
To start off, 1996 Renault Safrane is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Aston Martin 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Aston Martin 15 would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Safrane weights approximately 528 kg more than 1942 Aston Martin 15.
Because 1942 Aston Martin 15 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Aston Martin 15. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Aston Martin 15 | 1996 Renault Safrane | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | 15 | Safrane |
Year Released | 1942 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1950 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1650 kg |