1942 Aston Martin 15 vs. 2003 Honda Accord
To start off, 2003 Honda Accord is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Aston Martin 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Aston Martin 15 would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Accord weights approximately 348 kg more than 1942 Aston Martin 15.
Because 1942 Aston Martin 15 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Aston Martin 15. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Aston Martin 15 | 2003 Honda Accord | |
Make | Aston Martin | Honda |
Model | 15 | Accord |
Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1950 cc | 2204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1470 kg |