1942 Aston Martin 15 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Aston Martin 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Aston Martin 15 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 470 kg more than 1942 Aston Martin 15.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Aston Martin 15 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | 15 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1950 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1592 kg |
