1942 Aston Martin 15 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Aston Martin 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Aston Martin 15 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 444 kg more than 1942 Aston Martin 15.
Because 1942 Aston Martin 15 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Aston Martin 15. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1942 Aston Martin 15 has manual transmission. 1942 Aston Martin 15 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Aston Martin 15 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | 15 | BLS |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1950 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1566 kg |