1942 Buick 40 vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 Lotus Elan is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Buick | Lotus |
| Model | 40 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 660 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2140 mm |
