1942 Buick 40 vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1975 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |