1942 Buick 40 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (144 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | 40 | 200 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1080 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2510 mm |
