1942 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1942 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |