1942 Buick 40 vs. 1998 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (234 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 1998 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Buick | Chrysler |
Model | 40 | Concorde |
Year Released | 1942 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1605 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |