1942 Buick 40 vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1998 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | 40 | 75 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1520 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |