1942 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Buick | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 40 | 146 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1275 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2550 mm |