1942 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Caterham 7
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2000 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Buick | Caterham |
Model | 40 | 7 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 10750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 58 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 440 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2260 mm |