1942 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 242 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Buick | Mercury |
| Model | 40 | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1832 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |
