1942 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 114 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2001 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2001 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | 40 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1942 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2610 mm |