1942 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Buick | Caterham |
Model | 40 | 7 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2230 mm |