1942 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2270 mm |