1942 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 72 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1662 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2780 mm |
