1942 Buick 40 vs. 2004 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2004 MG ZT-T is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT-T weights approximately 35 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2004 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Buick | MG |
| Model | 40 | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1625 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2830 mm |
