1942 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Toyota Mark II is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Toyota Mark II.
Because 2004 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2004 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2600 mm |