1942 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Carnival (143 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2005 Kia Carnival.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2005 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Buick | Kia |
| Model | 40 | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2902 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 8800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 97.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2910 mm |
