1942 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 100.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3010 mm |
