1942 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 60 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1715 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2840 mm |