1942 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (163 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | 40 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |
