1942 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 3 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2650 mm |