1942 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 453 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | 40 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2043 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2950 mm |