1942 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (163 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 625 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1180 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |
