1942 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 232 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Charger |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1887 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3048 mm |