1942 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Buick 40 (163 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2490 mm |