1942 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Honda Pilot
To start off, 2010 Honda Pilot is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Pilot (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Pilot weights approximately 300 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Pilot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2010 Honda Pilot | |
| Make | Buick | Honda |
| Model | 40 | Pilot |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1955 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2774 mm |
