1942 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1330 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3710 mm |