1942 Buick 40 vs. 2011 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2011 Seat Exeo is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Seat Exeo (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2011 Seat Exeo.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2011 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | Buick | Seat |
| Model | 40 | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2642 mm |
