1942 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 164 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1942 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1754 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2649 mm |