1942 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1131 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Buick 40 | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1942 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2721 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3100 mm |