1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1950 Holden FX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 60 | FX |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2620 mm |
