1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1955 Oldsmobile 98
To start off, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 92 kg more than 1955 Oldsmobile 98.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1955 Oldsmobile 98 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 60 | 98 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 5320 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1728 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 3210 mm |
